Kamala Harris exhibited a persistent ridiculous style with a greasy attitude and laughter, much like she did in previous debates. It appears that she has been using this as a means of covering up her political ignorance while also trying to mask her perplexity over ideas and topics that she does not understand or wish to discuss. Without a doubt, this woman lacks the qualifications to be an inspirational leader, and her performance in the debate demonstrated that she is a political zero. Harris is clearly a political puppet, and without her team of advisors, she is undoubtedly disconnected from the issues facing modern-day America. Generally speaking, it appears that she had memorized certain things because of his inexperience and ignorance, which caused her to get perplexed and give different answers to various questions. To put it another way, she was talking meaningless things that had no bearing on anything. Kamala once stated, for instance, that “Trump’s proposal will change what it takes to change change”.  Other times she repeated things without making any sense. Kamala Harris portrayed herself as a participant in the successes of President Biden, for example in environmental issues, while in the Afghanistan issues that Americans gave up billions of dollars in weapons and logistics, or regarding the Ukrainian war that the Democratic party of the USA started, and the potential nuclear Russia’s threat she chews her words. The same approach applies to Kamala Harris’s suspicious behavior regarding her support for the Minneapolis antifa counter-rebels.

On the subject of the economy, Harris stated that there are some Nobel economists including Goldman Sachs big bankers, (recall that the corrupt Goldman Sachs big bankers were behind the global financial crisis of 2008) who support her economic program. Of course, the fact that Kamala Harris is mentioned in the support of these big sharks of the banking community I don’t think it particularly honors both her and the democratic party that has people like CORTEZ and SANDERS in its ranks.

Also, Harris took a shot at Trump on Project 2025 without evidence just to score points. This political and communicative approach is truly nauseating since Trump has publicly stated that he does not support it. In the mud of Kamala Harris, there was also the accusation that Trump sold microchips to China, thereby betraying America and its armed forces. Trump responded that the microchips were sold by Taiwan because that country holds the reins in this field. Also, she went on to blame Trump for the Covid pandemic, and she said that he is complicit with China in the pandemic. However, she failed to say why the Biden-Harris administration did nothing to reveal the truth, specifically on China’s connection to the virus. It wasn’t just the Woohan labs but also the biological labs in Ukraine that were of interest not just to the Democrats but specifically to the Biden family.  Also, Kamala Harris stood against Trump for the tariffs he imposed on China yet she chickened out when asked why the Biden-Harris administration kept the tariffs Trump imposed. Regarding health in America, both Trump and Kamala Harris have no solutions.

Regarding Trump’s presence, he certainly proved that he owns the issues asked in the debate as well and I felt that he was more alert to the upcoming difficult issues facing America in terms of wars, immigration, world peace, the decline of the values and ethos, and social expropriation. Trump also supports the decentralization of decisions because he believes the decisions must be taken by the local communities which are closer to their citizens. Nevertheless, there were moments when Trump manifested his twistedness along with incorrect characterizations.